Conservatives Must Support Roy Moore!

Support Roy Moore

This is important if I have any readers in Alabama I need you go out there tomorrow and vote for Judge Roy Moore for US Senate

I’m an openly gay black man and I support Roy Moore!  Why?

Roy Moore is a solid economic freedom fighter

Lower taxes, smaller government, and less spending [emphasis mine] will reduce the deficit and enable economic growth and a truly “stimulated” economy.

I believe in the reduction of taxes at all levels, and a need to reform the tax system by studying and implementing a “flat tax” or a “fair tax,” which is a tax on goods and services purchased instead of a tax on income.

To paraphrase an old saying, the only two things in life that are certain are death and taxes, but the truth is we are being taxed to death while our businesses are failing and our economy continues to suffer.Judge Moore’s Position on National Issues

He believes in enforcement of our immigration laws

I’m am American living in the Philippines. I gotta tell you even a poor corrupt country like the Philippines still manages to do something better than the US. It enforces it’s immigration laws. In the PH you can be deported just for disrespecting a Filipino. They say its a matter of national dignity and pride. It doesn’t matter whether you’re ‘contributing to the Philippine economy’.



Not so in the US we let illegal immigrants come here and make demands on us! Think I’m exaggerating? Watch illegal immigrants shout at the house democratic leader Nancy Pelosi  and calling her a liar.

Yes they’ve gotten so arrogant that they think they can come here illegally and then literally shout at our congress members and demand that we cater to them! Obviously I’m not fan of Nancy Pelosi but that level of disrespect from an immigrant legal or illegal should never be tolerated! If a group of Americans had shouted at Philippine senator Leila de Lima, for example, they would be deported immediately. These people need to go. DACA or no DACA.

What’s so funny about liberals is if I went to another country and demanded that they cater to me and wanted to hold its elected officials ‘accountable’ they would call me an ‘arrogant american’ and scold me for not respecting their culture or their laws. Yet they support and encourage those that don’t respect our culture or our laws.

Now lets talk about these accusations against judge Moore.

First and foremost they are accusations and nothing more. Nothing has been proven against Moore. You just have accusations from 40 years ago that some establishment republicans who didn’t want him around in the first place and of course the liberals and their mainstream media friends say they believe.

What happened to innocent until proven guilty?

Feminists have gotten so powerful in this nation that a woman simply ‘accusing’ a man of sexual misconduct is enough to end his career. The liberals will say ‘oh well they are credible accusations’. But uh what is credible? A grope doesn’t leave behind much evidence. The only thing that makes them ‘credible’ seems to be whether its possible that it could’ve happened or not. Maybe they were in the same place at the same time?

These accusations at best show that a man made some mistakes 40 years ago. Lets not forget that one of the accusers admitted to modifying the yearbook that Moore supposedly signed. Even if she hadn’t all it proves is that he signed a year book! Big whoop!

This goes waaayy beyond Roy Moore

Not voting for Roy Moore means we’d have another democrat in the Senate. Think about that means for a second. That’s one vote closer to the horrible policies of the Obama years. We’re talking Obamacare x2 people! Who knows maybe if the trend continues they might even be able to push through something as abominable as single payer socialized medicine. They’re making no bones that that’s what they want.

They want the end of the United States as we know it. They want a country where the PC police can literally arrest you if they get ‘triggered’ . Don’t believe me? Look at what they’ve done on facebook, twitter, and even quora to some extent. We all know conservatives are routinely censored on all of these sites. Better yet lets look at Europe. In the Netherlands ‘hate speech’ is a crime

Doug Jones is a horrible man because he is yet another agent for socialism and communism.

I implore to all Alabama voters to think about your country and think about the impact of having another Clinton crony in the US Senate.

Liberals New Slogan: Foreigners First

This is something that conservatives have been saying a long time and it gets brushed off as a simple disagreement. We all know liberals love to put foreigners first over their fellow Americans. We also know their common retort to this criticism: “no we love America that’s why we bitch so much about it”. That however is simply a cop out and I intend to prove with this article that for liberals their mantra truly is foreigners first.

Actions speak louder than words

While liberals say they love America and their fellow Americans the actions say that foreigners should come first.

Other cultures & countries over ours

Liberals always talk about respecting the cultures and customs of others while defending those that don’t respect ours. Liberals love to defend illegal immigrants even though by their very nature they disrespected our culture and our laws by coming here without permission. You know? Illegally!  So my question is where is the sympathy for Americans that get deported from other countries?  Mexico deports over 2000 Americans every year.

The reasons behind the expulsions are related to administrative misdeeds,” Monica Mora, of Mexico’s National Council of Science and Technology which collects the data, told FNL. “Principally tourists with expired visas, and those who remain without a residence permit or who are surprised while violating in some way the laws in Mexico. Fox News

The average liberals response is “that’s what they get for not respecting their laws and culture”. While I have no sympathy for criminals regardless of nationality the stark contrast in sympathies is very telling.

In the Philippines its worse. An American can be deported for nothing more than being rude to a Filipino or being an ‘undesirable alien’.

An overstaying and undocumented American faces deportation amid numerous complaints of rowdy behavior by residents and business owners in Ermita, Manila, the Bureau of Immigration (BI) said.

Morente said [The American], who is being held at the BI ward facility in Camp Bagong Diwa, Taguig City, will be deported for being “undesirable, overstaying and undocumented” alien. Inquierer.net

There doesn’t appear to be much sympathy for him either. But lets contrast that with this illegal Filipino in America who was busted for selling meth.

A Hawaii [father] and green card holder with a past drug conviction is fighting a deportation to the Philippines, saying it would mean almost certain death under Rodrigo Duterte’s brutal anti-drug campaign….

“I’ve made mistakes, but I believe people should get a second chance,” Carino said. “Some people might say that I deserve to go back to my country, but I did change. I do things for my community, I work hard to provide for my family, and I don’t want to lose them.” The Guardian

If you read the article you see nothing but sympathy for this drug dealer who doesn’t want to face the consequences for his actions (deportation). The fact that he wasn’t deported immediately after serving jail time on an aggravated felony demonstrates a failure in the US immigration system.

This is the kind of  garbage that gets me riled up. The Philippines doesn’t allow Americans just come and stay as long as they want to without papers. Neither does Mexico. In fact you can never gain full Filipino citizenship if you don’t have Filipino blood. Yet we’re supposed to have sympathy for those that broke the rules actually having to face consequences?

Liberals always talk about respecting other country’s cultures and customs while at the same time defending those that don’t respect ours.

Counter Protesters Swarm Anti-Illegal Immigrant Freedom Fighters

 Refugees over Americans

According to the PewResearch Project America admitted a record number of Muslim refugees in 2016. But that’s not the important part. Besides the fact that these people can be potentially dangerous (regardless of religion) the important part is that these refugees enjoy lavish government benefits on our dime.



First they get $1850 as a ‘welcome gift’ from the American tax payer but it doesn’t stop there:

Refugees needing cash assistance can get it through Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). This is temporary financial assistance and social services for those eligible low-income refugees with dependent children. Cash assistance for refugees who do not qualify for TANF can also be obtained through Refugee Cash Assistance. This is available for those in U.S. for up to 8 months.

Supplemental Security Income (SSI) is also an option for incoming refugees and those who settled in the U.S. for up to nine years. This is cash is cash assistance for those low-income individuals who may be elderly, blind, or disabled.

Refugees who’ve been in the United States up to seven years are also offered medical financial assistance through Medicaid as well as through the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). Otherwise, Refugee Medical Assistance is available for up to eight months for those individuals who are not eligible for Medicaid.

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is made available to refugees for up to nine years while social services for refugees — including job training, placement, and retention for those settled in the U.S — are available for up to five years. Daily Caller

All this while Americans are struggling to keep their heads above water!  With all these benefits a refugee family ends up receiving more money than an average working American family in Alabama.  As I said: foreigners first.

Illegals over our Veterans

The liberal media doesn’t like to mention the fact that many illegal immigrants get free health care. According to the liberal PBS

But while federal law generally bars illegal immigrants from being covered by Medicaid, a little-known part of the state-federal health insurance program for the poor pays about $2 billion a year for emergency treatment for a group of patients who, according to hospitals, mostly comprise illegal immigrants

All this while our veterans are literally dying waiting to be seen by a doctor.  Yes our vets are dying waiting to be seen by the VA. According to the liberal CNN

The VA’s inspector general found that out of about 800,000 records stalled in the agency’s system for managing health care enrollment, there were more than 307,000 records that belonged to veterans who had died months or years in the past.

In one case, a veteran who applied for VA care in 1998 was placed in “pending” status for 14 years. Another veteran who passed away in 1988 was found to have an unprocessed record lingering in 2014, the investigation found.

Liberals want to give illegal immigrants free health care while the American veterans who fought for their freedom to hate America are dying waiting for it.

Illegal Students over our Students

Americans owe approximately 1.2 trillion in student loan debt. Most of that to the federal government. As anyone with a federal student loan knows those can’t be discharged in bankruptcy and they never go away. As a conservative we all know the reason college tuition has gotten out of control is because of government interference.  If government would stop subsidizing these institutions tuition would plummet like a meteor in the night sky. That’ll never happen of course since Uncle Sam is profiting from the student loan racket. A profit to the tune of 135 billion dollars.

Where is that profit going? I suspect a large amount is used to give illegal immigrants free tuition. California, the city of Chicago and many other liberal bastions offer free or discounted tuition for illegal immigrants according to USA Today.

Read how President Trump is fighting back:

Trump Denies Visas to Countries that Won’t Take Back Deportees

Yes, Our Children Can Be Friends with White People!

Yes we can be friends with white people

This article is in response to the New York Times Op-Ed Can My Children Be Friends With White PeopleIt’s written by law professor Ekow N. Yankah and is currently one of the top op-eds in the New York Times. I read this article and of course the title is meant for shock value and in the article itself he says not all white people are bad blah blah blah.  I am a gay black conservative/libertarian who voted for Donald Trump so my perspective is unique to this topic.

Same old divisive leftist diatribe

He talks about a friend is someone that is not only friendly but truly cares about your well being. I couldn’t agree more. A friend is someone that not only talks the talk but walks the walk with you which brings me to my point about the left. They do a good job (admittedly better than conservatives) at humoring Blacks into thinking that they are on their side, especially during election season, but their policies not only do little to nothing for Blacks but actually hurt us.

Case in point 1: Chicago & Illinois

Chicago is a democratic city in the solidly democratic state of Illinois. Conservatives have no voice in Chicago and little in Illinois. Let’s see how Blacks are doing in Chicago. Well, not only does Chicago have the highest Black youth unemployment with 50% neither working nor in school the entire state of Illinois it has the lowest black employment rate in the country according to the conservative Illinoispolicy.org 

This has lead to Chicago being one of the murder capitals of America.  Frankly despite all of our talk about police brutality (some of it valid) I’d be more scared walking down the streets in the south side of Chicago than I would in redneck country or around any police headquarters. This is course makes perfect sense everyone knows when you have young men–of any race–with nothing productive to do that means trouble. Frankly from what I’ve seen most black people aren’t worried about being friends with white people they’re more scared of other black people!

Let me take this moment to make it clear to my readers that yes black people want to work! It’s just that labor unions and liberals have driven away a lot of the jobs that were traditionally done by Blacks particularly Black men.  The research is clear and profound:

… for each 10 percent increase in the federal or state minimum wage employment for young Black males decreased 6.5 percent. By contrast, after the same wage boost, employment for white and Hispanic males fell respectively just 2.5 percent and 1.2 percent.-Young Black Men Are the First to Go with Minimum Wage Hike

Case in point 2: Texas vs California

Texas is often presented as the poster child of the right and California of the left. Both states are doing well macroeconimcally but if we dig just a little bit deeper we can see a clear victor on which state is best for the majority of its people.  Look at the map above. In California 54% of Black people have some form of work while in Texas it’s 60%. That’s not just a snap shot in time either. Employment for Black Texans is increasing at a steady rate and Blacks getting richer. Compare that to their brothers and sisters in California

Now lets look at everyone else

 

You see income growth for everyone has grown the most in the two largest red states according to the conservative Heritage Foundation. So much for the leftiest diatribe of conservatives voting against their own interests. To put it more bluntly according to the Sacramento Bee “California exports its poor to Texas”

There was really nothing left for me in California,” said Kundurazieff, who also writes a blog about his cats. “The cost of living was high. The rent was high. The job market was debatable.” Friends in Texas suggested he relocate. He now works at a Walmart in Houston, making a little north of $10 an hour. He works 40 hours a week, riding his bike about 7 miles to work many days. He does not pay state income tax. His rent is just over $500, with utilities.

He’s not exaggerating either. California unequivocally has the nation’s highest poverty rate. According to the center left Politico

We have the highest poverty rate in the nation — higher than New Mexico, higher than any of the southern states, Louisiana, Alabama, higher than Idaho.-Politico

Case in point 3: Camden New Jersey

The liberal solution to everything is throw more money at it and bigger government. Does that work though? New Jersey spends on average $20,385 per student to educate their students. Statewide, per-pupil costs ranged from a high of $60,129 in one small district, to $10,181 for a Jersey City charter school with 310 students. If the liberal formula of more money=better outcomes then New Jersey students should be darn near the top in academic performance. Well I think you know where this is going. In Camden New Jersey nearly half of all students graduate on appeal meaning they failed to meet the state’s basic standards to get a high school diploma according to the liberal NPR News.

While not a slam dunk vouchers and charter schools have proven to be a better option than traditional government run schools. So much so even the liberal Brookings Institute had to admit that:

Harvard, University of Wisconsin and Brookings studied programs in New York City, the District of Columbia and Dayton. African American children did much better on test scores having had advantage of a voucher program.

Can we be friends with white people or should we be friends with liberals?

The left loves to focus on questions of race and gender as those are divisive. Conservatives did the same thing with same sex marriage in the early 2000’s but both of these are the wrong questions. Which side is doing better for the most people? If we look at Blacks, economic freedom tends to benefit blacks the most.  Instead of asking if we can be friends with white people what the professor should be asking is ‘Should Blacks be friends with liberals?’ Based on his criteria of actually caring about our well being it seems to be liberals care in their rhetoric but not in their policies. The tide of economic freedom raises all boats while big government only benefits a select few; mostly government employees and their labor union bosses.

I can’t help but remember my mother used to always tell me:

Talk is cheap

The New Gay Agenda- Preference Shaming

The new gay agenda- preference shaming

Take a look at the popular gay blog Queerty. If you scroll down you’ll see their tagline “No agenda except for the gay one”. If you read their articles you’ll see what the gay agenda means to them. Right now it seems to be trying to make people feel bad for having sexual preferences.

Here is a video of a white guy bitching about racism in the gay community

According to Queerty

For a people bonded by feeling different, sometimes it seems like we’ve learned to be almost as mean as the people who made us feel being different was wrong in the first place.

Queerty

In another article they state:

71% of gay men said they are actively turned off by a prospective partner who demonstrates signs of femininity. Meanwhile, 29% said they saw more effeminate characteristics in men as a positive trait.

So what’s the takeaway from all this?

Well, it looks as though a large majority of these gay men harbor misogynist attitudes, which they seem to apply toward themselves and others.

Queerty


Boo-fucking-hoo activists

There is a plethora of research to show that preferences are human and innate throughout the animal kingdom. According to Psychology Today.  Straight men have a preference for:

Youth

Long hair

Small waists

Blonde Hair

Blue Eyes

According to another article in the same publication straight women have a preference for:

Social status

Resources (money)

Height

Muscular physique

This shouldn’t be a shock to anyone that hasn’t been living under a rock their entire lives. What is shocking though is the liberal gay community seems to think preferences shouldn’t apply to gay men. When was the last time you saw an article on Cosmo Magazine trying to shame women for not being attracted to effeminate men? When was the last time you saw an article in Ebony magazine trying to shame Black women for having a preference for Black men? Hell I don’t even see lesbian publications trying to shame lesbians for have preferences. Full disclosure I don’t read lesbian publications.

Where does it stop?

I have a question to all those guys in the video that were crying because they didn’t get as much attention as they’d hoped on grindr. Have you ever rejected someone because you weren’t into them? Do you have preferences that you are attracted to or do you just accept anybody due to political correctness?  I have another question to all the PC lunatics. Are gay men sexist because they have a preference for men over women? Are tops ‘rolist’ because they have a preference for bottoms over tops?  Are bottoms ‘penisist’ because many of them prefer big dicks? Where does it stop?


Look up to 5

Guilting people doesn’t work

Preference shaming or guilting people into dating someone they don’t like won’t work. Who wants to date someone that doesn’t really want to be with them? It’s just like the racial activists that try to guilt white men into dating people they aren’t attracted to. If you talk to communities of color, however, they do have preferences and many of them are racial preferences.  There are sites like gayblackproud.org that do nothing but celebrate black beauty and put black men on a pedestal. There gay Latino pride sites as well, GayLatino&Proud. Under the leftist logic are those sites not racist also for promoting the beauty of one race over another? I bet if there was gay white and proud site there would be cries to shut it down and it would be given the scarlet letter of ‘racist’.

The hypocrisy

I saved the funniest part for last. Many of those who feel slighted have the same preferences are those who are slighting them. The Problematic Gender Politics Between Masc and Fem Gays-Vice. Most effeminate men don’t want effeminate men themselves! In addition most of the racial activists that are whining about white men themselves want to date white men exclusively.  In other words they’re crying, screaming, and shouting at other people for having the same preferences they do. Nice.

Now let’s take a look at Queerty itself shall we?

Did you notice something? Did you notice that almost every other article has a feature image of hot white men with their shirts off? Now if they’re so anti-preference why would they do that? Is it because feature images of hot men with their shirts off are more likely to get clicks which translates into more $$ for Queerty? So much for being a publication of principles Queerty.

The truth

Now for the real bombshell. Gay people are actually more likely to date outside of their race than straight people. According to the Williams Institute a liberal think tank that studies trends in homosexuality.

More than one in five same-sex couples (20.6%) are interracial or interethnic compared to 18.3% of different-sex unmarried couples and just 9.5% of different-sex unmarried couples (see Figure 5). More than half of same-sex couples in Hawaii (53%) are interracial or interethnic (see Figure 6). About a third fit that category in California (33%), New Mexico (31%), and Nevada (30%). Other states where same-sex couples are likely to be interracial or interethnic include Alaska (28%), District of Columbia (28%), Oklahoma (26%), Arizona (26%), Texas (25%), and Colorado (24%). Less than 10% of same-sex couples are interracial or interethnic in Maine, Mississippi, Vermont, West Virginia, and New Hampshire, and Alabama.-The Williams Institute

This just goes to show it’ll never be enough for the activists. They’ll always need something to bitch about in order to make themselves feel important.

The real solution

We are who we are and we like who we like. If someone isn’t into you for whatever reason suck it up and move on. Sorry Sean not everyone is going to be attracted to you. The free market also has a solution. There are now apps specifically for specific niches in the gay community.  Growlr for instance is specifically for large and/or mature men and their admirers. The app does half the work for you since by being on that app you’re saying you’re into large and/or mature men. Black men tend to use Jack’d. If there is a market need I’m sure there will be an app for gay asian & latino men and their admirers as well. There are facebook groups specifically for gay men over 30 as well!

In short stop whining! If your life is a pile of shit then plant some seeds and see if you can make something grow out of it. Don’t try to shame others into rolling in it with you.

 

Why Latin America is Poor

The reason why Latin America is poor is largely cultural. Oh no!! Racist alert! Kick him off the internet!!

Hear me out please!

Certain cultures are more apt to embrace liberal/leftist ideas and mindsets than others. This is article will make the case for why Latin American poverty is mostly due to culture:

Exhibit A Venezuela vs. Chile:

Venezuela was once the richest nation in Latin America. With vast oil reserves they enjoyed great wealth and prosperity they were the envy of their neighbors. Venezuela was Latin America’s richest country and now it is in complete crisis — here’s how it fell apart Thanks to Hugo Chavez I think we all know that’s no longer the case

Chile by contrast was one of the poorest nations of Latin America they had mining but socialist governments prevented economic freedom from bringing overall prosperity.

Then something changed.

Chile brought in Augsto Pinochet. He was a staunch capitalist who ushered in economic freedom. He allowed people and companies to compete causing prices to go down while economic output went up. Chile then became the unquestioned economic leader in Latin America despite having a small population and being geographically isolated. Read about the Chilean economic miracle. Pinochet tried his best to keep the leftist culture at bay but eventually the leftists won and forced him out. The country still embraced economic freedom until Michelle Bachlet came into power. Michelle Bachlet Good for Gays Bad for Chile – She ushered in economic ‘reforms’ like socialized universities and more ridiculous government handouts. These combined with a decline in the price of copper (Chile’s main export) have dramatically hurt the country.

Exhibit B Vietnam, Singapore, and Hong Kong

Vietnam has had more bombs dropped on it than any nation on Earth. To put it more plainly the US bombed the shit out of them. We did it to try to stop communism. Thanks to American leftists we were forced to withdraw suffering one of the most humiliating military defeats in our history. Ironically though communism didn’t last that long. Vietnam ended up embracing economic freedom . They are now one of the fastest growing nations (economically speaking) on Earth. Vietnam’s Economic Growth Surges to Above 7% as Exports Climb. Singapore & Hong Kong were also poor nations. Singapore was once just a random island in the middle of nowhere and Hong Kong was just a rock.

Why the culture difference? You see the Asian culture tends to value allegiance to authority, education, and hard work more than other cultures. We can take a look at something I enjoy; male sex symbols:

 

This is a Latin sex symbol. Notice the long hair, the tattoos, the rebellious look on his face. This guy screams “I follow no one’s rules!” and “I don’t have a job!”. Why Latin America is poor could be lately attributed to this guy.

 

Contrast that to what makes = women in Asia moist. You see the short & well groomed hair, professional attire, non-threatening smile, the light skin indicating he doesn’t spend much time outside rather he’s inside working.

 

 

 

 

These two images demonstrate the difference in culture. When you have a culture that embraces rebellion and being rebellious and ‘tough’ is what can get a guy laid that’s what many men will do.

Latin America has a protest always question authority culture. They protest over the smallest even most common sense reforms. For example in Mexico Pina Nieto passed a series of basic reforms for example that teachers could no longer sell their credentials to their children and the teacher’s union protested even that! I’m not kidding! There is a sense of entitlement in the mindsets of a lot of people (but not all) in Latin America.

Now for some anecdotes

I’ve been an expat in Latin America & in Asia. There are simply different mindsets. Let’s contrast Mexican gold diggers with Filipino ones. In Mexico I would have guys just message me on facebook out of the blue and ask:

“necesito dinero me puedes dar?” “I need money can you give it to me?”. I would ask in exchange for what? They would unashamedly say “pues quiero dinero a cambio de nada” “I want money money in exchange for nothing”.

I think they knew it was unlikely I would acquiesce but to even have the balls to ask for money like that is abhorrent in my view. Now Filipino gold diggers will say “Oh I love you lots I cook for you clean for you blah blah” even though in reality that may not happen at least they had the decency to offer something in return.

Now of course all cultures have beggars that want something for nothing but again I’ve never experienced people directly saying they wanted money in exchange for nothing until I lived in Latin America. That fits right into the paradigm of socialism. “You have more than I do so I’m entitled to some of what you have even if I didn’t earn it”. Its no wonder you see constant protests and advocacy for taking what others have worked for in order to give it to those that did nothing. So long as the culture of certain areas embraces the ‘I want something for nothing’ mindset they will always be poor and always be protesting.

If you want to know more

If you are truly interested to understand how economic freedom brings prosperity for a nation read this book: Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty eBook: Abhijit Banerjee, Esther Duflo: Kindle Store

Not All Alike Fight for Similar Causes

An Essay

For my entire life I have heard liberals talk about “people of color.” At first, I wasn’t sure what they were referring to because the closest thing I had ever heard of “people of color” was “colored” which simply meant “black.” I later learned that “people of color” is the name for the concept that all racial minorities are somehow one and are in this battle to fight white supremacy. This puzzled me because I, as a black man, had never thought of myself as “a person of color” before. The liberals then told me that I was “of color” simply by virtue of not being white. I felt that this idea was silly at the time and I have tried to wrap my mind around it by attending conferences and hanging out with these liberals, but now, nearly two years later, I still think it is just as silly as when I first heard it.

I feel this way because there is simply no such thing as a specific “person of color!” I don’t recall ever meeting a person whose skin color is clear. Every single human being has some sort of color, so how can they say that only certain people can qualify to be “of color?”

The idea that all the ethnic minorities are somehow united in this struggle for equality is equally as silly. In Los Angeles, many Hispanics are moving into what were traditionally black neighborhoods and a battle between the two races has ensued. I remember reading a quote from a young Hispanic man when he was asked about the situation; he simply replied “Fuck those niggers, this is our neighborhood now!”

It’s not just the Hispanics either; many Asians have racial differences with blacks. Asians are known to be “the model minority,” as they seem to have shown the most willingness to assimilate into American culture. Unfortunately, a part of that American culture is looking down upon or having a negative view of blacks. I have personally encountered more racist Asians in my lifetime than I have racist whites.

These liberal fascists also expect that as a person of color, I’m supposed to accept certain aspects of our society, such as the homosexual lifestyle, the constant disrespect for our southern border or PC thuggery. For the record, I do accept gays and support limited legal immigration. However, I know many black brothers and sisters who do not support such things. In an Internet forum for black students on Facebook, one girl said homosexuality was “disgusting. I saw Brokeback mountain yesterday while eating lunch and I almost threw up!” In addition, I am black and I absolutely do not support illegal immigration into the United States.

A lot of these liberals want to control the population, and me, by controlling our language. What is their tool for this? Political correctness thuggery, otherwise known as PC thuggery. As described in 1984 by George Orwell, one of the best methods of mind control is to control language. In the novel, the government deletes certain words from the vocabulary that go against its goals just the same as the liberal fascists do on this campus. For example, I’ve been told, very sternly, that the words “girls,” “ladies” and “Hispanic” are all offensive and should not be used. What is interesting is that the people who told me this do not say it is offensive to them personally; they always seem to say it is offensive to the group they claim to represent. I know plenty of females who refer to themselves as “girls.” My mother taught me to open the door for a female and say “ladies first,” and a friend from up north always refers to himself as “Hispanic” and not Latino, despite the fact that the liberal fascists of this campus say it is the proper way to refer to them.

My question is, why does my skin color oblige me or any other supposed “person of color” to accept any of these liberal ideas? The fact is that the liberal activists on this campus who claim to represent us do not. They are only representing themselves and their own political power aspirations. The professors who speak from an ivory tower that have served as their inspiration are simply out of touch with their own communities and they do not represent their respective communities.

[kleo_register register_title=”Create Account”]

Support Free Speech at UC Berkeley

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.”
― George Orwell

Protect Free Speech Week

For months the leftist administration at the tax payer funded University of California at Berkeley have tried to come up with excuse after excuse to block free speech week on their campus. They didn’t respond to emails, made outrageous funding requests, and set arbitrary deadlines in order to stop free speech week from happening on campus.  Milo Yiannopoulos author of the best selling book Dangerous  (read it on a Kindle Fire) explains in this video all of the attempts the university has made thwart the event.
America's Best Contact Lenses & Eyeglasses

Milo Yinnanpolus

Ann Coulter

The ‘never trumper’ disgrace Ben Shapiro

Nicholas Dirks

Anita Alvarez

Action Bronson

Emily Wong

John Brennan

Jason Riley

John Derbyshire

Suzanne Venker

Source Business Insider

This is but a small list of conservative voices that liberal university administrators have tried to or succeeded in silencing on university campuses. We cannot allow this to continue. These voices have a right to be heard regardless of what liberal administrators think or their friends in the main stream media.

“If you allow yourself to be silenced then you didn’t deserve to be heard in the first place”-Me

I am a gay black conservative and you better believe I’ve gotten a lot of flack for that. Including from my own family. I, however, have chosen to take the harder path and not allow myself to be silenced. Here’s a recent facebook post by me.

So I’ve had very well intentioned good hearted people ask me why I post some of the controversial things that I do on my facebook account. The reason is if we allow people to effectively silence opinions that they don’t like/agree with then we lose who we are as a society. The free discussion of ideas if what intellectualism is all about in my opinion.

One person commented in a private message that I was driving people away. He was right. But what he didn’t realize was I am also drawing new people towards me. Friendships come and friendships go but you’ll always have to live with yourself. I’d rather have to lose some friends than to know I was silenced by those that disagree with me. I can and have made new friends. I can never make a new me.

Why Blacks, Latinos & Gays Should Be Conservatives

Why Blacks, Latinos, and Gays Should be Conservatives

As those of you who read this blog already know I am not just a conservative but I’m a gay black conservative. I’ve written another article about it if you want to read about why I voted for President Trump. The purpose of this article is to explain why my fellow peoples of color and sexual orientations should join me.

Blacks are poor


Blacks are poor. Despite decades of liberal policies 28% of blacks live below the poverty line compared to only 10% of whites, 12% of Asians, and 25% of Hispanics. The black unemployment rate remains near double that of whites.  This according to business insider. The next question is is that the liberals fault and if so how?  For this we will look at California the nation’s liberal Vatican. Conservatives essentially have no voice in this state and haven’t for the last 20-30 years.  Well in the Golden State the white median household  net worth is $240,000 while it is just 34k for Blacks. Educationally the achievement gap for Blacks verses other groups is not only astonishingly bad just sad.  The LA Times reports the English achievement gap between Blacks and Asians was 44% and in math it was a whopping 53%. I found the English achievement gap the most disturbing since most Asians are descendants of 1st or 2nd generation immigrants from English speaking countries.

Latinos are poor

Survival Kit from Amazon.com


Latinos I’m afraid you guys aren’t doing much better. 60.7% of Latino household virtually no savings and are considered liquid asset poor. That’s compared to only 28% of white households. Nearly 30% of Latino households live in poverty. Latino test scores in math declined nearly 50% and also suffer from high educational achievement gaps. Oh and 25% of Latinos live in poverty nation wide.

Gays are poor

Despite the media trope as portraying gay men as these rich titans the reality couldn’t be further from the truth. The liberal think tank The Williams Institute Institute  report California-LGBT Divide  stated that even though the left coast has the greatest protections for LGB peoples 30% have an income of below 24k per year. In the south where acceptance is the least it’s 33% this despite a difference of 13 point gap in the Law and Social climate index between the two regions. Why don’t the gaps correlate more closely?  Maybe because economic freedom is more effective at reducing poverty than more laws and regulations?

Patriot Survival Kit

Black and Latino gays are really f*cking poor

In California 19% of white LGBT individuals report an income of less than 24k while 30%-36% of Black and Latino LGBTs do.

“Government isn’t the solution to our problem government is the problem”

All this despite the fact that California has some of nation’s highest tax rates and highest government spending growth in the nation. The liberal Huffington Post released a report called The Worst States for Black Americans. Almost all of them were blue or purple states.  Contrast that to what Forbes Magazine found:  Today, [The South] has emerged, in many ways, as the new promised land for African-Americans.”  The best states for Blacks are conservative run states.  When the free market is allowed to flourish the rising tide lift all boats regardless of race or sexual preference. Liberals have tried and failed to solve the poverty crises amongst minorities for years through victim hood and larger and larger government. It failed. Black conservatives are right, Latino conservatives are right, gay conservatives are right. Liberals are wrong.

Read about how conservatives are coming around on the issue of homosexual acceptance. 

 

 

Why I Support Sweatshops & Child Labor

Why I Support Sweatshops & Child Labor

I 100% support sweatshops and child labor.  Let me say it again: I 100% support sweatshops & child labor. “Let’s throw eggs at this monster!” That’s what those of you sitting at your computers reading this are thinking right? I mean what kind of a decent human being can support the deplorable conditions that we all read and see on TV? But here’s the thing: ‘Those of you sitting at home on your computers reading this’. This is an act of privilege just as buying organic produce is privilege. In our world of privilege we often fail to see the choices many of the worlds population must face.

Sweatshops are better than the alternative

In a economically free society people are free to make choices that they think will best suit them. Capitalism allows that more than any other system we’ve tried in human history. Sweatshops often employ people from rural areas with little or no education and basically no job alternatives. Sweatshop labor involves long hours, deplorable working conditions all in exchange for meager  salaries. Or does it?

  • The International Labour Organisation estimates that agricultural workers suffer 250 million accidents every year, and say that in some countries the fatal accident rate is twice as common in agriculture as in other industries. “Out of a total of 335,000 fatal workplace accidents worldwide,” say the ILO, “there are some 170,000 deaths among agricultural workers.”  source
  • People that work in sweatshops are healthier than their agricultural counterparts. source
  • Sweatshops empower women. Sweatshop work forces are dominated by woman. This empowers them to make their own decisions and not have to tolerate abusive spouses/partners. sources

Sweatshops are the first step out of poverty

Because sweatshop workers earn so much more than they would if they remained rural simpletons sweatshops are not only a first step out of poverty for a family but for a nation as well.

As any historian could tell you, no society has ever pulled itself out of poverty without putting its children to work. Back in the early 19th century, when Americans were as poor as Bangladeshis are now, we were sending out children to work at about the same rate as the Bangladeshis are today. Having had the good fortune to get rich first, Americans can afford to give Bangladeshis a helping hand, and there are plenty of good ways for us to do that. Denying Third Worlders the very opportunities our ancestors embraced, whether through fullfledged boycotts or by insisting on health and safety standards they can’t afford to meet, is not one of those ways. Buy The Armchair Economic by Steven Landsburg 

With the earnings of child sweatshop workers they use that money to put their siblings through school to lift their families out of poverty even more.  Here’s a chart showing apparel income as a percentage of national income.

Sweatshops help prevent child prostitution

Going back to the sweatshops are better than the alternative argument. In a very famous case Democrat Senator Tom Harkin ‘freed’ 50,000 Bangladesh children from sweatshop labor. I’m sure Mr. Harkin patted himself on the back for that as well. Well what Mr. Harkin and other liberals didn’t take the time to think about is what would happen to those children once they lost their jobs. Well now we know. A good chunk of those kids ended up becoming prostitutes for local and international pedophiles.

Good intentions don’t always equal good outcomes

Anti-sweatshop activism is a go-to for many liberal college students. These privileged kids are well intentioned but their activism leads to disastrous outcomes for those they are seeking to help. Just as many liberals pat themselves on the back for driving that Toyota Prius which uses child labor in its manufacturing process and in some cases is actually worse for the environment than conventional cars.

Economic freedom improves working conditions

As mentioned earlier all countries including the United States had sweatshops and child labor at one point in their histories. What led to the decline of sweatshops in America? No it wasn’t labor unions it was economic freedom. In the beginning the government steadfastly supported the factories in America. It wasn’t until the economy was strong enough to support the labor movement that the government allowed it grow. Unfortunately now labor unions have outgrown their usefulness and continue to push for more legislation to restrict economic freedom and just like the workers in the developing world the most vulnerable lose their jobs. In the case of America its young black men. Remember all employers (yes that includes sweatshops) must compete with the alternatives for workers. Once the economy of a particular grows sweatshops will cease to exist as workers will have far better alternatives. As seen above if we try to close them legislatively we just end up with more poverty plight for those we intended to help.

If you like this article make sure to subscribe to The Rainbow Right by filling out the form below!

Trump Denies Visas to Countries that Won’t Take Back Deportees

U.S. Issues Visa Sanctions Against Recalcitrant Countries

The Trump administration has kept yet another promise. The Trump State department has issued visa sanctions against four nations that repeatedly and routinely refuse take back deportees. The countries are Cambodia, Guinea, Sierra Leone and Eritrea.

The Secretary of State has ordered consular officers in Eritrea, Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Cambodia to implement visa restrictions effective September 13, 2017,” the department said in a statement provided to The Washington Times. “The Secretary determined the categories of visa applicants subject to these restrictions on a country-by-country basis. WT

  • Cambodia: Only top diplomats and their families will be denied tourist or business visas.
  • Eritrea: All new tourist and business visas will be halted.
  • Guinea: Government officials and family members will be denied business, tourist, and student and exchange program visas.
  • Sierra Leone: Diplomats and immigration officials will be denied business and tourist visas.

There was no mention on whether current visas will be rescinded. The move may be largely symbolic since it’s within reason to suspect those top diplomats and other elites already had visas to the United States. It does, however, send a clear message that a new chief is in town and these nations need to begin taking back their deportees just as the US does.

The administration was going to add Iraq to the list but Iraq acquiesced in exchange for not being included in the travel ban

Patriot Survival Kit

Promise Kept

During the 2016 presidential campaign then candidate Trump promised to crack down on countries that are recalcitrant in taking back their deportees. He lambasted previous administrations for not doing more to resolve this issue. Previous administrations responded to the problem by sending threatening letters to the recalcitrant nations. Americans have suffered at the hands of foreign criminals. In 2014  Thong Vang,was released from prison  after being convicted of rape. His country of origin, Laos repeatedly declined to repatriate him. He returned to prison in 2016 and shot two guards.

Thousands of foreign criminals remain in the US

According to the same Washington Times Article:

35,000 Criminal Cubans await deportation

1,900 Criminal Chinese citizens await deportation

 

Wouldn’t this be easier to read on a laptop or a tablet?